Jun 26, 2013 3:12 AM
The U.S. Support Apparatus Behind NSA Traitor Snowden
NSA叛徒斯諾登背後的美國支持http://www.aim.org/aim-column/the-u-s-support-apparatus-behind-nsa-traitor-snowden/print/
If the NSA
or the FBI wants to find fugitive Edward Snowden, who is apparently in
hiding in Chinese Hong Kong, its analysts and agents might want to
examine a controversial non-profit group, the Freedom of the Press
Foundation, and its main financial sponsor, the San Francisco-based
Foundation for National Progress.
如果國安或聯邦調查局希望找到顯然是在躲藏在中國香港的逃犯愛德華·斯諾登，其分析師和代理人可能要檢查一個有爭議的非營利組織，自由新聞基金會，其主要財務贊助商- 總部位於舊金山的國家進步基金會。
The Freedom of the Press Foundation [1], which includes Snowden’s media mouthpiece and handler Glenn Greenwald on its board, acknowledges [2] that the organization “is made possible by the fiscal sponsorship of the Foundation for National Progress.”
董事會成員包括斯諾登的媒體喉舌代理 - 衛報記者格倫·格林沃爾德的自由新聞基金會[1], ，承認[2]該組織的財政由國家進步基金會資助。
Mother Jones journalists accepted an award [4]
this year named in honor of I.F. Stone, who postured as an
“independent” journalist but was exposed as a Soviet agent of influence.
Greenwald had previously received [5] the award.
"母親瓊斯"的記者今年接受一個領獎[4], 該獎項紀念I.F. Stone而命名，I.F. Stone,擺出一個“獨立”記者的姿勢，但被揭露為蘇聯特工。格林沃爾德曾接受過[5]該獎項。
Snowden is their new hero. “At the heart of Edward Snowden’s decision to expose the NSA’s massive phone and Internet spying programs was a fundamental belief in the people’s right-to-know,” says [6] actor John Cusack on the website of the Freedom of the Press Foundation. Cusack is also a member of its board.
斯諾登是他們新的英雄。 “在愛德華·斯諾登決定揭露國安的大量的電話和互聯網間諜程序的核心, 是一個人民有知情權根本的信念，”[6]演員約翰·庫薩克在自由出版社基金會的網站上說。庫薩克也是其董事會成員。
The Freedom of the Press Foundation, which openly funnels money to WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, says it is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, and that the Foundation for National Progress “provides users a way to give tax-deductible donations.”
公開給錢資助維基解密和阿桑奇的自由新聞基金會說，這是一家501（c）（3）非營利組織，國家進步基金會“，為給捐款用戶提供了一種扣稅方式。“
“We are pleased to receive anonymous donations in the mail,” it says.
“我們樂於收到郵件中的匿名捐款，”它說。
In fact, U.S. officials regarded WikiLeaks as hostile to the United States because it publicly released classified counter-terrorism information from Army analyst Bradley Manning, who is now on trial for espionage against the U.S. and aiding the enemy. WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange went to work for Moscow-funded television.
事實上，美國官員認為維基解密對美國懷有敵意，因為它公開發布來自陸軍分析員布拉德利·曼寧的分類反恐信息, ，曼寧現在被判反美間諜和通敵罪。 維基解密創始人朱利安·阿桑奇（Julian Assange）,去了莫斯科資助的電視台上班。
Prosecutors say that WikiLeaks material was found in the possession of Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda after a U.S. raid killed the terrorist leader.
檢察官說，美國突襲擊斃恐怖分子頭目本·拉登和“基地”組織時, 發現拉登擁有維基解密的材料。
Assange has called Snowden a “hero,”
but NSA Director General Keith Alexander said at a hearing of the House
Intelligence Committee on Tuesday that the leaks created “irreversible
and significant damage” to national security. Rep. Michele Bachmann
(R-MN), a member of the committee, said Snowden was clearly a “traitor.”
阿桑奇稱斯諾登為“英雄”，但在星期二眾議院情報委員會舉行的聽證會上, 國家安全局局長基思·亞歷山大將軍說，洩漏給”國家安全造成“不可逆轉的重大損害。該委員會的成員, 明尼蘇達州共和黨眾議員米歇爾巴赫曼斯諾登說，斯諾登顯然是一個“叛徒”。“
The title of the hearing was, “How Disclosed NSA Programs Protect Americans, and Why Disclosure Aids Our Adversaries [8].”
聽證會的標題是，“披露NSA程序如何保護美國人，為什麼披露將有助於我們的敵人”[8]。
But the radical left, including members of Barack Obama’s “progressive” base, are rallying around Snowden, even as Obama himself gives lip service to what the NSA is doing.
但激進的左派，包括奧巴馬的“進步”基地，在為斯諾登振臂，甚至奧巴馬本人對國安所做的給予口惠。
Another member of the family, Penny Pritzker, is a Chicago billionaire nominated by President Obama to lead the Commerce Department. Her nomination has been held up because of questions [9] from Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) about income generated from an offshore account.
另一名家族成員，佩尼.普利茲克, 芝加哥億萬富翁, 由美國總統奧巴馬提名引領商務部。她的提名, 因為愛荷華州共和黨參議員查爾斯·格拉斯利（R-IA）質疑她關於從離岸帳戶產生的收入而受阻[9]。
The Freedom of the Press Foundation board [10] includes not only Glenn Greenwald of the British Guardian, but Laura Poitras, described [11] by Alana Goodman of The Washington Free Beacon as a “long-time activist filmmaker who has railed against U.S. counterterrorism policies put into place after the Sept. 11 attacks.”
新聞自由基金會董事會[10]不僅包括英國的“衛報格倫·格林沃爾德，還有Laura Poitras，[11], 一個被華盛頓自由燈塔 的阿拉納古德曼描述為911恐怖襲擊後 ”長期的積極分子抨擊美國反恐政策的電影製片人。“
Poitras and Greenwald arranged [12] the secret interview with Snowden in Hong Kong and authored the Guardian’s story about him. Poitras also shared the lead byline with former Post journalist Barton Gellman on the front-page NSA story in The Washington Post [13].
Poitras和格林沃爾德安排[12]斯諾登在香港的秘密採訪，並在“衛報”撰寫了關於他的故事。 Poitras也與前“衛報”記者巴頓格爾曼分享了領頭署名, 讓他在“華盛頓郵報”頭版發表NSA故事[13]。
Poitras, who is emerging as perhaps the
central figure in the NSA leaks controversy, even more important than
Greenwald, says she “has been detained and interrogated about her work
at the U.S. border over 40 times.” Greenwald himself has written [14] that the Department of Homeland Security has been behind her detentions and interrogations.
Poitras，出現為或許是NSA洩漏的爭論比格林沃爾德更重要的核心人物，說，她“在美國邊境已經被拘留和審訊她的工作40次以上。”格林沃爾德自己寫道: [14]國土安全部一直在背後支持她的拘留和審訊。
In a New York Times interview [15],
she said she had been placed on a “Watch List” by the U.S. Government
since 2006, and claims she has been trying to find out why, with the
assistance of the ACLU.
在紐約時報一次採訪[15]，她說自2006年以來她已被美國政府放置在一個“觀察名單”，並聲稱，她在美國公民自由聯盟的協助下, 一直試圖找出原因。
John McCormack, a staff writer for The Weekly Standard, may have the answer. He reports [16] evidence that Poitras, who has been covering the wars in the Middle East, “had foreknowledge of a November 20, 2004 ambush of U.S. troops [in Iraq] but did nothing to warn them.” He says a Joint Terrorism Task Force investigation was launched about the attack, but that no charges were filed against Poitras, and she did not respond to requests for comment.
一 名標準周刊記者約翰·麥科馬克可能有答案。他報導[16]證據顯示 : Poitras，曾經負責覆蓋中東戰爭報導，“一早知道 二零零四年十一月二十日在伊拉克有伏擊美軍的行動，但沒有警告他們。”他說，一個聯合反恐專案組調查發起的攻擊，但沒有對Poitras提出指控 ，她沒有回應置評請求。
Nevertheless, the Soros-funded blog Think Progress hailed [17] Poitras for making “a series of powerful documentaries about the impact of the War on Terror.” Think Progress is part of the Center for American Progress, one of the major Soros-funded groups in Washington, D.C.
然而，索羅斯資助的博客 - 進步思考- 對 Poitras 為 反恐戰爭的影響製作了一系列強有力的紀錄片作出敬禮。
The Freedom of the Press Foundation promotes Snowden as a whistleblower, rather than a traitor, as do “journalism and transparency organizations” such as WikiLeaks, the Center for Public Integrity, and the National Security Archive, the latter two of which are funded by Soros.
Another member of the Freedom of the Press Foundation’s board is Josh Stearns, the Journalism and Public Media Campaign Director at Free Press, a Soros-funded group started by Marxist Professor Robert. W. McChesney.
另一個自由新聞基金會董事會成員喬希貝爾斯登，自由出版社的新聞及公共媒體運動主任，一個由馬克思主義教授羅伯特.W.麥克切斯尼領導組成的, 接受索羅斯資助的小組。
Free Press has launched a petition campaign demanding that Congress investigate the National Security Agency’s terrorist surveillance activities, labeled “spying programs.”
“Stand up for privacy and push Congress to dig up the truth about the NSA’s surveillance schemes,” the left-wing group says. “Millions of Americans have woken to the threat the NSA’s programs pose to our civil liberties.”
“為隱私站起來和推動國會挖國家安全局的監控計劃的真相” 左翼團體說。 “數以百萬計的美國人已經意識到國安局的項目構成我們的公民自由的威脅。”
Similar claims have been echoed on the right [18] by some personalities in the conservative media, such as radio host Michael Savage.
類似的聲稱已在右邊保守媒體的一些人物，如電台節目主持人邁克爾·薩維奇, 發生呼應[18]，
A “Stop Spying on Us” website [19] has been launched, featuring “A Network of Groups Across the Political Spectrum, Organizing against Surveillance Abuse, Government Repression, and Political Witch Hunts; and Working to Expand Civil Liberties, Free Speech, and the Right to Dissent for All.”
一個 名為“停止刺探我們”的網站[19]已經啟動，特點在於網絡不同的政治派別, 為反對濫用監控，政府鎮壓，政治迫害, 為擴大所有人的公民自由, 言論自由和 異議權組織工作。
Another coalition, “Stop Watching Us [20],” includes conservative groups such as Freedom Works and the Competitive Enterprise Institute, in addition to MoveOn.org, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Greenwald’s Freedom of the Press Foundation.
另一個聯盟，“停止監督視我們[20]”，除了MoveOn.org，電子前沿基金會，格林沃爾德的自由新聞基金會, 還包括保守團體 - 自由作品和競爭企業研究所。
Coming to the defense of Greenwald, the Soros-funded Free Press has attacked Rep. Peter King of New York for saying that “journalists who report NSA surveillance leaks should be arrested.”
King was referring to Snowden’s comments, in the interview arranged by Greenwald and Poitras, that he possessed the “full rosters of everyone working at the NSA, the entire intelligence community and undercover assets all around the world, the locations of every station we have, what their missions are and so forth.”
King 是指斯諾登在格林沃爾德和Poitras安排採訪中聲稱他擁有在國家安全局工作的特工的“全名冊，整個情報社區和在世界各地的秘密資產，我們擁有的各站位置，他們的任務是什麼等等。“
Greenwald promised “significant
revelations that have not yet been heard over the next several weeks and
months,” but denies he had threatened to name U.S. covert agents.
格林沃爾德承諾"在未來的幾個星期和幾個月, 將有尚未聽說過的重大披露", 但否認他曾威脅披露美國秘密特工的名字。
However, since Greenwald has a history of anti-American rhetoric and is a fixture at international Communist conferences, as documented [22] by Accuracy in Media, disclosures of this classified information to individuals and groups hostile to the United States cannot be ruled out.
然而，因為正如 Accuracy in Media 記錄[22]檔案顯示, 格林沃爾德有反美言論記錄和是一個國際共產會議的fixture ，不能被排除了他會給敵視美國的個人和團體披露機密分類信息。
如果國安或聯邦調查局希望找到顯然是在躲藏在中國香港的逃犯愛德華·斯諾登，其分析師和代理人可能要檢查一個有爭議的非營利組織，自由新聞基金會，其主要財務贊助商- 總部位於舊金山的國家進步基金會。
The Freedom of the Press Foundation [1], which includes Snowden’s media mouthpiece and handler Glenn Greenwald on its board, acknowledges [2] that the organization “is made possible by the fiscal sponsorship of the Foundation for National Progress.”
董事會成員包括斯諾登的媒體喉舌代理 - 衛報記者格倫·格林沃爾德的自由新聞基金會[1], ，承認[2]該組織的財政由國家進步基金會資助。
The Foundation for National Progress is
best known as the publisher of Mother Jones magazine, and is backed by
several prominent liberal foundations, including the Open Society
Institute of billionaire George Soros, according to its 2010/2011 annual report [3].
根據其2010/2011年度報告[3], 國家進步基金會, “瓊斯母親”雜誌的出版商, 由 幾個著名的自由主義基金會 - 包括億萬富翁喬治·索羅斯的開放社會研究所的支持。 "母親瓊斯"的記者今年接受一個領獎[4], 該獎項紀念I.F. Stone而命名，I.F. Stone,擺出一個“獨立”記者的姿勢，但被揭露為蘇聯特工。格林沃爾德曾接受過[5]該獎項。
Snowden is their new hero. “At the heart of Edward Snowden’s decision to expose the NSA’s massive phone and Internet spying programs was a fundamental belief in the people’s right-to-know,” says [6] actor John Cusack on the website of the Freedom of the Press Foundation. Cusack is also a member of its board.
斯諾登是他們新的英雄。 “在愛德華·斯諾登決定揭露國安的大量的電話和互聯網間諜程序的核心, 是一個人民有知情權根本的信念，”[6]演員約翰·庫薩克在自由出版社基金會的網站上說。庫薩克也是其董事會成員。
The Freedom of the Press Foundation, which openly funnels money to WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, says it is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, and that the Foundation for National Progress “provides users a way to give tax-deductible donations.”
公開給錢資助維基解密和阿桑奇的自由新聞基金會說，這是一家501（c）（3）非營利組織，國家進步基金會“，為給捐款用戶提供了一種扣稅方式。“
“我們樂於收到郵件中的匿名捐款，”它說。
One purpose of the arrangement is to
make sure that WikiLeaks has a secure funding source, as “U.S. officials
unofficially pressured payment processors to cut WikiLeaks off from
funding in late 2010, despite the fact that the organization has never
been charged with a crime,” the group claimed [7].
該項安排的目的之一是確保維基解密有一個安全的資金來源，“美國官員在2010年年底非正式對支付處理器施壓力, 切斷維基解密的資金，儘管事實上該組織從未被指控犯罪"，該組織聲稱：“[7]In fact, U.S. officials regarded WikiLeaks as hostile to the United States because it publicly released classified counter-terrorism information from Army analyst Bradley Manning, who is now on trial for espionage against the U.S. and aiding the enemy. WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange went to work for Moscow-funded television.
事實上，美國官員認為維基解密對美國懷有敵意，因為它公開發布來自陸軍分析員布拉德利·曼寧的分類反恐信息, ，曼寧現在被判反美間諜和通敵罪。 維基解密創始人朱利安·阿桑奇（Julian Assange）,去了莫斯科資助的電視台上班。
Prosecutors say that WikiLeaks material was found in the possession of Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda after a U.S. raid killed the terrorist leader.
檢察官說，美國突襲擊斃恐怖分子頭目本·拉登和“基地”組織時, 發現拉登擁有維基解密的材料。
阿桑奇稱斯諾登為“英雄”，但在星期二眾議院情報委員會舉行的聽證會上, 國家安全局局長基思·亞歷山大將軍說，洩漏給”國家安全造成“不可逆轉的重大損害。該委員會的成員, 明尼蘇達州共和黨眾議員米歇爾巴赫曼斯諾登說，斯諾登顯然是一個“叛徒”。“
聽證會的標題是，“披露NSA程序如何保護美國人，為什麼披露將有助於我們的敵人”[8]。
But the radical left, including members of Barack Obama’s “progressive” base, are rallying around Snowden, even as Obama himself gives lip service to what the NSA is doing.
但激進的左派，包括奧巴馬的“進步”基地，在為斯諾登振臂，甚至奧巴馬本人對國安所做的給予口惠。
One of the prominent directors of the
Foundation for National Progress that is backing Snowden is Susan S.
Pritzker, a member of one of the richest families in the United States,
the Pritzker family, which is very close to Obama. The Pritzker family
owns the Hyatt Hotel chain.
國家進步基金會支持斯諾登的董事之一是蘇珊·普利茲克, 在美國最富有的家族之一的成員，普利茲克家族坐擁凱悅酒店連鎖集團, 跟奧巴馬非常接近。Another member of the family, Penny Pritzker, is a Chicago billionaire nominated by President Obama to lead the Commerce Department. Her nomination has been held up because of questions [9] from Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) about income generated from an offshore account.
另一名家族成員，佩尼.普利茲克, 芝加哥億萬富翁, 由美國總統奧巴馬提名引領商務部。她的提名, 因為愛荷華州共和黨參議員查爾斯·格拉斯利（R-IA）質疑她關於從離岸帳戶產生的收入而受阻[9]。
The Freedom of the Press Foundation board [10] includes not only Glenn Greenwald of the British Guardian, but Laura Poitras, described [11] by Alana Goodman of The Washington Free Beacon as a “long-time activist filmmaker who has railed against U.S. counterterrorism policies put into place after the Sept. 11 attacks.”
新聞自由基金會董事會[10]不僅包括英國的“衛報格倫·格林沃爾德，還有Laura Poitras，[11], 一個被華盛頓自由燈塔 的阿拉納古德曼描述為911恐怖襲擊後 ”長期的積極分子抨擊美國反恐政策的電影製片人。“
Poitras and Greenwald arranged [12] the secret interview with Snowden in Hong Kong and authored the Guardian’s story about him. Poitras also shared the lead byline with former Post journalist Barton Gellman on the front-page NSA story in The Washington Post [13].
Poitras和格林沃爾德安排[12]斯諾登在香港的秘密採訪，並在“衛報”撰寫了關於他的故事。 Poitras也與前“衛報”記者巴頓格爾曼分享了領頭署名, 讓他在“華盛頓郵報”頭版發表NSA故事[13]。
Poitras，出現為或許是NSA洩漏的爭論比格林沃爾德更重要的核心人物，說，她“在美國邊境已經被拘留和審訊她的工作40次以上。”格林沃爾德自己寫道: [14]國土安全部一直在背後支持她的拘留和審訊。
在紐約時報一次採訪[15]，她說自2006年以來她已被美國政府放置在一個“觀察名單”，並聲稱，她在美國公民自由聯盟的協助下, 一直試圖找出原因。
John McCormack, a staff writer for The Weekly Standard, may have the answer. He reports [16] evidence that Poitras, who has been covering the wars in the Middle East, “had foreknowledge of a November 20, 2004 ambush of U.S. troops [in Iraq] but did nothing to warn them.” He says a Joint Terrorism Task Force investigation was launched about the attack, but that no charges were filed against Poitras, and she did not respond to requests for comment.
一 名標準周刊記者約翰·麥科馬克可能有答案。他報導[16]證據顯示 : Poitras，曾經負責覆蓋中東戰爭報導，“一早知道 二零零四年十一月二十日在伊拉克有伏擊美軍的行動，但沒有警告他們。”他說，一個聯合反恐專案組調查發起的攻擊，但沒有對Poitras提出指控 ，她沒有回應置評請求。
Nevertheless, the Soros-funded blog Think Progress hailed [17] Poitras for making “a series of powerful documentaries about the impact of the War on Terror.” Think Progress is part of the Center for American Progress, one of the major Soros-funded groups in Washington, D.C.
然而，索羅斯資助的博客 - 進步思考- 對 Poitras 為 反恐戰爭的影響製作了一系列強有力的紀錄片作出敬禮。
The Freedom of the Press Foundation promotes Snowden as a whistleblower, rather than a traitor, as do “journalism and transparency organizations” such as WikiLeaks, the Center for Public Integrity, and the National Security Archive, the latter two of which are funded by Soros.
自由新聞基金會宣傳斯諾登為告密者，而不是一個叛徒，一如促進“新聞和透明度組織 -維基解密，公共誠信中心，以及國家安全檔案，”, 後兩者 ( 公共誠信中心和國家安全檔案 ) 都是被索羅斯資助。
Another member of the Freedom of the Press Foundation’s board is Josh Stearns, the Journalism and Public Media Campaign Director at Free Press, a Soros-funded group started by Marxist Professor Robert. W. McChesney.
另一個自由新聞基金會董事會成員喬希貝爾斯登，自由出版社的新聞及公共媒體運動主任，一個由馬克思主義教授羅伯特.W.麥克切斯尼領導組成的, 接受索羅斯資助的小組。
Free Press has launched a petition campaign demanding that Congress investigate the National Security Agency’s terrorist surveillance activities, labeled “spying programs.”
自由出版社已經發動了請願運動，要求國會調查美國國家安全局的，被標籤為“間諜項目”的恐怖分子監視活動。
“Stand up for privacy and push Congress to dig up the truth about the NSA’s surveillance schemes,” the left-wing group says. “Millions of Americans have woken to the threat the NSA’s programs pose to our civil liberties.”
“為隱私站起來和推動國會挖國家安全局的監控計劃的真相” 左翼團體說。 “數以百萬計的美國人已經意識到國安局的項目構成我們的公民自由的威脅。”
Similar claims have been echoed on the right [18] by some personalities in the conservative media, such as radio host Michael Savage.
類似的聲稱已在右邊保守媒體的一些人物，如電台節目主持人邁克爾·薩維奇, 發生呼應[18]，
A “Stop Spying on Us” website [19] has been launched, featuring “A Network of Groups Across the Political Spectrum, Organizing against Surveillance Abuse, Government Repression, and Political Witch Hunts; and Working to Expand Civil Liberties, Free Speech, and the Right to Dissent for All.”
一個 名為“停止刺探我們”的網站[19]已經啟動，特點在於網絡不同的政治派別, 為反對濫用監控，政府鎮壓，政治迫害, 為擴大所有人的公民自由, 言論自由和 異議權組織工作。
The National Lawyers Guild, once identified as a Communist front, is playing a key role in the effort.
全國律師協會, 一個曾被確定有共產主義背景的組織, ，在這些努力中發揮了關鍵作用。Another coalition, “Stop Watching Us [20],” includes conservative groups such as Freedom Works and the Competitive Enterprise Institute, in addition to MoveOn.org, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Greenwald’s Freedom of the Press Foundation.
另一個聯盟，“停止監督視我們[20]”，除了MoveOn.org，電子前沿基金會，格林沃爾德的自由新聞基金會, 還包括保守團體 - 自由作品和競爭企業研究所。
Coming to the defense of Greenwald, the Soros-funded Free Press has attacked Rep. Peter King of New York for saying that “journalists who report NSA surveillance leaks should be arrested.”
為了為格林沃爾德辯護，索羅斯資助的自由出版社攻擊紐約眾議員彼得·金, 指控彼得·金說：“報導洩漏國家安全局的監控的記者誰應該被逮捕。”
This is not what King said, however. Appearing on Fox News, King had said [21],
“Greenwald, not only did he disclose this information, he has said that
he has names of CIA agents and assets around the world, and they’re
threatening to disclose that. The last time that was done in this
country, we saw a CIA station chief murdered in Greece… I think it
should be very targeted, very selective and certainly a very rare
exception. But, in this case, when you have someone who discloses
secrets like this and threatens to release more, yes, there has to
be—legal action taken against him.”
然
而這不是King
所說的。Kin在福克斯新聞曾表示[21]，“格林沃爾德，他不僅透露這一信息，他說，他有中情局特工和在世界各地資產的名單，他們威脅要披露名單。在這
個國家做的最近一次，我們看到了美國中央情報局在希臘的站長被謀殺...我覺得應該是非常有針對性，非常有選擇性的，肯定是一個非常罕見的例外。但是，在
這種情況下，當有人這樣的公開秘密，並威脅要披露更多的秘密，是的，有必要對他採取法律行動。“King was referring to Snowden’s comments, in the interview arranged by Greenwald and Poitras, that he possessed the “full rosters of everyone working at the NSA, the entire intelligence community and undercover assets all around the world, the locations of every station we have, what their missions are and so forth.”
King 是指斯諾登在格林沃爾德和Poitras安排採訪中聲稱他擁有在國家安全局工作的特工的“全名冊，整個情報社區和在世界各地的秘密資產，我們擁有的各站位置，他們的任務是什麼等等。“
Since Greenwald presumably has access
to Snowden’s classified information on U.S. intelligence activities,
including the names of agents around the world, King’s concern may be
valid.
由於格林沃爾德大概有管道接觸斯諾登對美國的情報活動的分類信息，包括世界各地特工的名字，King的關注可能是合理有效的。
由於格林沃爾德大概有管道接觸斯諾登對美國的情報活動的分類信息，包括世界各地特工的名字，King的關注可能是合理有效的。
格林沃爾德承諾"在未來的幾個星期和幾個月, 將有尚未聽說過的重大披露", 但否認他曾威脅披露美國秘密特工的名字。
However, since Greenwald has a history of anti-American rhetoric and is a fixture at international Communist conferences, as documented [22] by Accuracy in Media, disclosures of this classified information to individuals and groups hostile to the United States cannot be ruled out.
然而，因為正如 Accuracy in Media 記錄[22]檔案顯示, 格林沃爾德有反美言論記錄和是一個國際共產會議的fixture ，不能被排除了他會給敵視美國的個人和團體披露機密分類信息。
Article printed from Accuracy In Media: http://www.aim.org
URL to article: http://www.aim.org/aim-column/the-u-s-support-apparatus-behind-nsa-traitor-snowden/
URLs in this post:
[1] The Freedom of the Press Foundation: https://pressfreedomfoundation.org/
[2] acknowledges: https://pressfreedomfoundation.org/about
[3] 2010/2011 annual report: http://assets.motherjones.com/about/MotherJones_AnnualReport_20102011b.pdf
[4] accepted an award: http://www.aim.org/aim-column/soviet-agent-award-for-mother-jones-reporter/
[5] received: http://www.aim.org/aim-column/izzy-award-sends-blogger-into-a-tizzy/
[6] says: https://pressfreedomfoundation.org/blog/2013/06/snowden-principle
[7] the group claimed: https://pressfreedomfoundation.org/blog/2012/12/ten-days-and-almost-120000-breakdown-our-transparency-journalism-beneficiaries
[8] How Disclosed NSA Programs Protect Americans, and Why Disclosure Aids Our Adversaries: http://intelligence.house.gov/hearing/how-disclosed-nsa-programs-protect-americans-and-why-disclosure-aids-our-adversaries
[9] questions: http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/breaking/chi-penny-pritzker-commerce-20130617,0,4999309.story
[10] board: https://pressfreedomfoundation.org/about/staff
[11] described: http://freebeacon.com/radical-activist-filmmaker-laura-poitras-shared-byline-on-wapo-nsa-story/
[12] arranged: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/video/2013/jun/09/nsa-whistleblower-edward-snowden-interview-video
[13] the front-page NSA story in The Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/us-intelligence-mining-data-from-nine-us-internet-companies-in-broad-secret-program/2013/06/06/3a0c0da8-cebf-11e2-8845-d970ccb04497_story.html
[14] written: http://www.salon.com/2012/04/08/u_s_filmmaker_repeatedly_detained_at_border/singleton/
[15] interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2l8hx0dn3so#!
[16] reports: http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/soldiers-allege-laura-poitras-co-author-nsa-scoop-had-foreknowledge-2004-iraqi-attack-us-troops_735111.html
[17] hailed: http://thinkprogress.org/alyssa/2012/04/10/460754/laura-poitras/?mobile=nc
[18] echoed on the right: http://www.aim.org/aim-column/conservative-media-personalities-embrace-traitors-charges/
[19] “Stop Spying on Us” website: http://www.stopspying.us/
[20] Stop Watching Us: https://optin.stopwatching.us/
[21] said: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=EeH0feovXLs
[22] documented: http://www.aim.org/aim-column/glenn-greenwald-regularly-attends-marxist-leninist-conferences/
